Botswana vs East Timor: Mountain Green Cover Index
Botswana
94.7%
in 2021
East Timor
94.9%
in 2021
Botswana rank
95th
East Timor rank
93rd
Mountain Green Cover Index over time
- Botswana
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 94.9% against 94.7% in Botswana, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 93rd of 185 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.0% | 96.9% | 1.0% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 95.2% | 95.8% | 0.6% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 94.7% | 94.9% | 0.2% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mountain green cover index, Botswana or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 94.9% against 94.7% in Botswana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mountain green cover index between Botswana and East Timor?
- 0.2%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for mountain green cover index?
- Botswana ranks 95th and East Timor ranks 93rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations β processed by Our World in Data, published as Mountain Green Cover Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mountain Green Cover Index.