Namibia vs South Sudan: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Namibia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Sudan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Namibia rank
45th
South Sudan rank
42nd
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Namibia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 45th and South Sudan ranks 42nd of 192 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Namibia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Namibia and South Sudan?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Namibia and South Sudan rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Namibia ranks 45th and South Sudan ranks 42nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.