Morocco vs Qatar: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Morocco
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Qatar
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Morocco rank
135th
Qatar rank
137th
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Morocco
- Qatar
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Qatar, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Qatar ahead.
Morocco ranks 135th and Qatar ranks 137th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Morocco or Qatar?
- Morocco, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Morocco and Qatar?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Qatar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Morocco and Qatar rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Morocco ranks 135th and Qatar ranks 137th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.