Malawi vs Togo: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Malawi
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Togo
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi rank
41st
Togo rank
39th
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Malawi
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 41st and Togo ranks 39th of 192 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Togo |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Malawi or Togo?
- Togo, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Malawi and Togo?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Togo?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Togo rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Malawi ranks 41st and Togo ranks 39th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.