Libya vs Paraguay: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Libya
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Paraguay
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya rank
96th
Paraguay rank
93rd
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Libya
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Paraguay ahead.
Libya ranks 96th and Paraguay ranks 93rd of 192 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Libya or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Libya and Paraguay?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Paraguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Paraguay rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Libya ranks 96th and Paraguay ranks 93rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.