Eritrea vs Lesotho: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Lesotho
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
17th
Lesotho rank
19th
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Lesotho, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 17th and Lesotho ranks 19th of 192 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Eritrea, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 17th and Lesotho ranks 19th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.