Chile vs Peru: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Peru
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
148th
Peru rank
146th
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 148th and Peru ranks 146th of 192 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Chile or Peru?
- Peru, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Chile and Peru?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 148th and Peru ranks 146th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.