Angola vs Oman: Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP
Angola
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Oman
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Angola rank
124th
Oman rank
121st
Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP over time
- Angola
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 124th and Oman ranks 121st of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Oman |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp, Angola or Oman?
- Oman, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp between Angola and Oman?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Oman?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Oman rank globally for minimum requirement calories, per unit of gdp?
- Angola ranks 124th and Oman ranks 121st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Minimum requirement calories, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Minimum requirement calories divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.