Ecuador vs New Zealand: Military spending, per square kilometre

Ecuador
12,566 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
13,722 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
73rd
New Zealand rank
70th

Military spending, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 13,722 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre against 12,566 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1,156 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Ecuador ranks 73rd and New Zealand ranks 70th of 171 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 658.87 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,913 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,254 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 1,461 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,489 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,028 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 1,944 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 5,019 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,075 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 2,909 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 5,610 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,701 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 4,304 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 6,351 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,047 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 9,107 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 10,448 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 1,341 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 11,642 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 13,682 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,040 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher military spending, per square kilometre, Ecuador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 13,722 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre against 12,566 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in military spending, per square kilometre between Ecuador and New Zealand?
1,156 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for military spending, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 73rd and New Zealand ranks 70th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Military spending, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Military spending, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/military-spending-per-square-kilometre-2/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/military-spending-per-square-kilometre-2/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Military spending, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Military spending, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,284 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Military spending divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.