Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Military spending, per square kilometre

Chile
8,488 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
6,982 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
82nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
85th

Military spending, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 8,488 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre against 6,982 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1,506 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 82nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 85th of 171 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 1,045 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 880.84 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 164.31 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 2,211 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 487.78 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 1,724 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 3,272 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 232.12 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,040 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 3,675 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 209.47 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,465 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 6,571 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 474.26 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 6,097 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 6,935 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,899 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,037 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 8,281 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 7,120 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 1,161 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher military spending, per square kilometre, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?
Chile, at 8,488 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre against 6,982 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in military spending, per square kilometre between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
1,506 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for military spending, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 82nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 85th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Military spending, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Military spending, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/military-spending-per-square-kilometre-2/chile/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/military-spending-per-square-kilometre-2/chile/equatorial-guinea/">Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Military spending, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Military spending, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,284 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Military spending divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.