Brazil vs South Africa: Military spending, per square kilometre

Brazil
3,272 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
2,995 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
110th
South Africa rank
111th

Military spending, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • South Africa
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 3,272 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre against 2,995 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 277 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Brazil ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 111th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 462.4 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 1,446 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 983.3 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 740.46 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,828 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,087 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 662.97 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 5,494 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 4,831 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 1,845 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 4,103 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 2,258 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 2,462 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,312 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 849.59 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 4,128 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,889 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 238.59 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 3,257 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 3,317 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre 60.39 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher military spending, per square kilometre, Brazil or South Africa?
Brazil, at 3,272 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre against 2,995 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in military spending, per square kilometre between Brazil and South Africa?
277 constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for military spending, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 111th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Military spending, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs South Africa: Military spending, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/military-spending-per-square-kilometre-2/brazil/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/military-spending-per-square-kilometre-2/brazil/south-africa/">Brazil vs South Africa: Military spending, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Military spending, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2022 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,284 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Military spending divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.