Australia vs Sri Lanka: Median age of public paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers
Australia
39
in 2015
Sri Lanka
38
in 2016
Australia rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
13th
Median age of public paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers over time
- Australia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Australia currently reports 39 against 38 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 13th of 25 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.75 | 38 | 3.75 | Australia |
| 2010s | 39.8 | 39 | 0.8 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age of public paid employees, by occupation: medical workers, Australia or Sri Lanka?
- Australia, at 39 against 38 in Sri Lanka as of 2015.
- What is the difference in median age of public paid employees, by occupation: medical workers between Australia and Sri Lanka?
- 1, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sri Lanka?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Sri Lanka rank globally for median age of public paid employees, by occupation: medical workers?
- Australia ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 13th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Median age of public paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.