Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Median age of public paid employees, by industry: Health
Sri Lanka
41
in 2016
Uruguay
42
in 2017
Sri Lanka rank
12th
Uruguay rank
10th
Median age of public paid employees, by industry: Health over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 42 against 41 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 10th of 27 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 44 | 4 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 40.5 | 42.25 | 1.75 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age of public paid employees, by industry: health, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 42 against 41 in Sri Lanka as of 2017.
- What is the difference in median age of public paid employees, by industry: health between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 1, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for median age of public paid employees, by industry: health?
- Sri Lanka ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 10th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Median age of public paid employees, by industry: Health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.