Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Median age of public paid employees, by industry: Health
Brazil
41
in 2017
Sri Lanka
41
in 2016
Brazil rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
12th
Median age of public paid employees, by industry: Health over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 41 against 41 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 27 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39 | 40 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 38.75 | 40.5 | 1.75 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age of public paid employees, by industry: health, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 41 against 41 in Sri Lanka as of 2017.
- What is the difference in median age of public paid employees, by industry: health between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for median age of public paid employees, by industry: health?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Median age of public paid employees, by industry: Health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.