Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Median age of private paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers
Brazil
34
in 2016
Sri Lanka
33
in 2016
Brazil rank
15th
Sri Lanka rank
17th
Median age of private paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 34 against 33 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 15th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 25 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.57 | 30.14 | 1.43 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 32.4 | 31.8 | 0.6 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age of private paid employees, by occupation: medical workers, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 34 against 33 in Sri Lanka as of 2016.
- What is the difference in median age of private paid employees, by occupation: medical workers between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 1, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for median age of private paid employees, by occupation: medical workers?
- Brazil ranks 15th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Median age of private paid employees, by occupation: Medical workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.