Philippines vs Sri Lanka: Median age of private paid employees, by industry: Health
Philippines
32
in 2019
Sri Lanka
31
in 2016
Philippines rank
20th
Sri Lanka rank
21st
Median age of private paid employees, by industry: Health over time
- Philippines
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 32 against 31 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 21st of 27 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30.14 | 0.1429 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 29.33 | 31.67 | 2.33 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age of private paid employees, by industry: health, Philippines or Sri Lanka?
- Philippines, at 32 against 31 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in median age of private paid employees, by industry: health between Philippines and Sri Lanka?
- 1, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sri Lanka?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Philippines and Sri Lanka rank globally for median age of private paid employees, by industry: health?
- Philippines ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 21st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Median age of private paid employees, by industry: Health. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.