Indonesia vs Papua New Guinea: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate
Indonesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Indonesia rank
82nd
Papua New Guinea rank
82nd
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate over time
- Indonesia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Indonesia ranks 82nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 111 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate, Indonesia or Papua New Guinea?
- Indonesia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Indonesia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate?
- Indonesia ranks 82nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.