India vs Zambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate
India
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Zambia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2025
India rank
82nd
Zambia rank
82nd
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate over time
- India
- Zambia
How they compare
India currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zambia ahead.
India ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 82nd of 111 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010s | 0 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 25 % change on previous year | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate, India or Zambia?
- India, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate between India and Zambia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do India and Zambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate?
- India ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 82nd of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.