Belgium vs Nepal: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate
Belgium
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Nepal
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Belgium rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate over time
- Belgium
- Nepal
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Nepal ahead.
Belgium ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 111 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 % change on previous year | -12.5 % change on previous year | 12.5 % change on previous year | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate, Belgium or Nepal?
- Belgium, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate between Belgium and Nepal?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nepal?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Nepal rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate?
- Belgium ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.