Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Mean age of private paid employees
Sri Lanka
40.04
in 2016
Uruguay
39.48
in 2020
Sri Lanka rank
28th
Uruguay rank
31st
Mean age of private paid employees over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 40.04 against 39.48 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.56.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.07 | 37.59 | 1.52 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 38.36 | 37.77 | 0.584 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean age of private paid employees, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 40.04 against 39.48 in Uruguay as of 2016.
- What is the difference in mean age of private paid employees between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0.56, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for mean age of private paid employees?
- Sri Lanka ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Mean age of private paid employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.