Sri Lanka vs Tonga: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Sri Lanka
0.0%
in 2007
Tonga
0.9%
in 2006
Sri Lanka rank
55th
Tonga rank
54th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 0.9% against 0.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tonga ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Tonga ranks 54th of 66 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Sri Lanka or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 0.9% against 0.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2006.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Sri Lanka and Tonga?
- 0.9%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tonga rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Tonga ranks 54th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.