Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage
Papua New Guinea
5.71
in 2024
East Timor
0
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
53rd
East Timor rank
55th
Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage over time
- Papua New Guinea
- East Timor
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 5.71 against 0 in East Timor, a difference of 5.71.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Timor ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 53rd and East Timor ranks 55th of 66 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.75 | 21.85 | 16.1 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 1.74 | 37.32 | 35.57 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage, Papua New Guinea or East Timor?
- Papua New Guinea, at 5.71 against 0 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage between Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 5.71, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Papua New Guinea and East Timor rank globally for lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 53rd and East Timor ranks 55th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.