Mozambique vs South Sudan: Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage
Mozambique
58.26
in 2024
South Sudan
56.32
in 2024
Mozambique rank
38th
South Sudan rank
39th
Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage over time
- Mozambique
- South Sudan
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 58.26 against 56.32 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.94.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 39th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.01 | 13.79 | 56.22 | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 40.33 | 44.47 | 4.14 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage, Mozambique or South Sudan?
- Mozambique, at 58.26 against 56.32 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage between Mozambique and South Sudan?
- 1.94, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and South Sudan rank globally for lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage?
- Mozambique ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 39th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.