Madagascar vs Nepal: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Madagascar
81.5%
in 2024
Nepal
79.8%
in 2024
Madagascar rank
15th
Nepal rank
18th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Madagascar
- Nepal
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 81.5% against 79.8% in Nepal, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nepal ahead.
Madagascar ranks 15th and Nepal ranks 18th of 66 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.4% | 25.6% | 7.2% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 30.0% | 68.5% | 38.5% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 41.1% | 72.7% | 31.7% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Madagascar or Nepal?
- Madagascar, at 81.5% against 79.8% in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Madagascar and Nepal?
- 1.7%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nepal?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Nepal rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Madagascar ranks 15th and Nepal ranks 18th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.