Kiribati vs Malaysia: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Kiribati
83.9%
in 2013
Malaysia
84.2%
in 2024
Kiribati rank
8th
Malaysia rank
7th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Kiribati
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 84.2% against 83.9% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 8th and Malaysia ranks 7th of 66 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.1% | 65.6% | 42.5% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 41.6% | 45.1% | 3.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Kiribati or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 84.2% against 83.9% in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Kiribati and Malaysia?
- 0.3%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2013.
- How do Kiribati and Malaysia rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Kiribati ranks 8th and Malaysia ranks 7th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.