Kiribati vs Malawi: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Kiribati
83.9%
in 2013
Malawi
83.0%
in 2013
Kiribati rank
8th
Malawi rank
11th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Kiribati
- Malawi
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 83.9% against 83.0% in Malawi, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Malawi ahead.
Kiribati ranks 8th and Malawi ranks 11th of 66 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 52.4% | 52.4% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 41.6% | 81.4% | 39.8% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Kiribati or Malawi?
- Kiribati, at 83.9% against 83.0% in Malawi as of 2013.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Kiribati and Malawi?
- 0.9%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2013.
- How do Kiribati and Malawi rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Kiribati ranks 8th and Malawi ranks 11th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.