Kenya vs Thailand: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Kenya
96.8%
in 2024
Thailand
93.4%
in 2012
Kenya rank
1st
Thailand rank
2nd
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Kenya
- Thailand
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 96.8% against 93.4% in Thailand, a difference of 3.4%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 2nd of 66 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.4% | 87.5% | 71.1% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 94.6% | 82.3% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Kenya or Thailand?
- Kenya, at 96.8% against 93.4% in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Kenya and Thailand?
- 3.4%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Thailand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do Kenya and Thailand rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Kenya ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 2nd of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.