India vs Kiribati: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
India
83.8%
in 2024
Kiribati
83.9%
in 2013
India rank
9th
Kiribati rank
8th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- India
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 83.9% against 83.8% in India, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kiribati ahead.
India ranks 9th and Kiribati ranks 8th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.1% | 31.0% | 18.9% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 57.0% | 41.6% | 15.4% | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, India or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 83.9% against 83.8% in India as of 2013.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between India and Kiribati?
- 0.1%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Kiribati?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.
- How do India and Kiribati rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- India ranks 9th and Kiribati ranks 8th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.