Fiji vs Wallis and Futuna: Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage
Fiji
41.7
in 2023
Wallis and Futuna
56.07
in 2007
Fiji rank
43rd
Wallis and Futuna rank
40th
Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage over time
- Fiji
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Wallis and Futuna currently reports 56.07 against 41.7 in Fiji, a difference of 14.37.
That makes Wallis and Futuna's figure about 1.3 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 43rd and Wallis and Futuna ranks 40th of 66 countries.
Wallis and Futuna has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage, Fiji or Wallis and Futuna?
- Wallis and Futuna, at 56.07 against 41.7 in Fiji as of 2007.
- What is the difference in lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage between Fiji and Wallis and Futuna?
- 14.37, with Wallis and Futuna ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Wallis and Futuna?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2007.
- How do Fiji and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage?
- Fiji ranks 43rd and Wallis and Futuna ranks 40th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.