Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Eritrea
71.8%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
72.9%
in 2024
Eritrea rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Eritrea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 72.9% against 71.8% in Eritrea, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eritrea ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 66 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.0% | 31.7% | 38.3% | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 73.9% | 0.0% | 73.9% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Eritrea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 72.9% against 71.8% in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
- 1.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Zimbabwe rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Eritrea ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.