Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage
Central African Republic
64.89
in 2024
Tuvalu
65.2
in 2022
Central African Republic rank
36th
Tuvalu rank
35th
Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage over time
- Central African Republic
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 65.2 against 64.89 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.31.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 36th and Tuvalu ranks 35th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.23 | 35.08 | 17.85 | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 25.65 | 21.73 | 3.92 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage, Central African Republic or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 65.2 against 64.89 in Central African Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage between Central African Republic and Tuvalu?
- 0.31, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tuvalu?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Central African Republic and Tuvalu rank globally for lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage?
- Central African Republic ranks 36th and Tuvalu ranks 35th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.