Brazil vs Tanzania: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Brazil
68.3%
in 2016
Tanzania
69.4%
in 2024
Brazil rank
31st
Tanzania rank
30th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Brazil
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 69.4% against 68.3% in Brazil, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tanzania ahead.
Brazil ranks 31st and Tanzania ranks 30th of 66 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.8% | 11.3% | 5.4% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 32.7% | 49.7% | 17.0% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Brazil or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 69.4% against 68.3% in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Brazil and Tanzania?
- 1.1%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tanzania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
- How do Brazil and Tanzania rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Brazil ranks 31st and Tanzania ranks 30th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.