Benin vs Malaysia: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Benin
83.3%
in 2020
Malaysia
84.2%
in 2024
Benin rank
10th
Malaysia rank
7th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Benin
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 84.2% against 83.3% in Benin, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.
Benin ranks 10th and Malaysia ranks 7th of 66 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.0% | 65.6% | 39.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 41.5% | 62.7% | 21.1% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 83.3% | 91.3% | 8.1% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Benin or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 84.2% against 83.3% in Benin as of 2024.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Benin and Malaysia?
- 0.9%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malaysia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Benin and Malaysia rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Benin ranks 10th and Malaysia ranks 7th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.