Benin vs Malawi: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Benin
83.3%
in 2020
Malawi
83.0%
in 2013
Benin rank
10th
Malawi rank
11th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Benin
- Malawi
How they compare
Benin currently reports 83.3% against 83.0% in Malawi, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 11th of 66 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.2% | 52.4% | 35.2% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 18.8% | 81.4% | 62.6% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Benin or Malawi?
- Benin, at 83.3% against 83.0% in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Benin and Malawi?
- 0.3%, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2013.
- How do Benin and Malawi rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Benin ranks 10th and Malawi ranks 11th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.