Benin vs Kiribati: Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis
Benin
83.3%
in 2020
Kiribati
83.9%
in 2013
Benin rank
10th
Kiribati rank
8th
Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis over time
- Benin
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 83.9% against 83.3% in Benin, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kiribati ahead.
Benin ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 8th of 66 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.4% | 24.9% | 2.5% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 18.8% | 41.6% | 22.7% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis, Benin or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 83.9% against 83.3% in Benin as of 2013.
- What is the difference in treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis between Benin and Kiribati?
- 0.6%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Kiribati?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do Benin and Kiribati rank globally for treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis?
- Benin ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 8th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Treatment coverage for lymphatic filariasis. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drug coverage out of estimated population who require it.