Bangladesh vs Nepal: Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage
Bangladesh
76.15
in 2015
Nepal
79.79
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
21st
Nepal rank
18th
Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage over time
- Bangladesh
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 79.79 against 76.15 in Bangladesh, a difference of 3.64.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 18th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.33 | 19.47 | 6.86 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 40.81 | 65.55 | 24.74 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage, Bangladesh or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 79.79 against 76.15 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage between Bangladesh and Nepal?
- 3.64, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Nepal?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and Nepal rank globally for lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage?
- Bangladesh ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 18th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Lymphatic filariasis treatment coverage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.