Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies

Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2020
Zimbabwe
100.0%
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st

Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Zimbabwe
020406080100201520182022

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 71 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 100.0% 88.0% 12.0% Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies, Trinidad and Tobago or Zimbabwe?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies between Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
0.0%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies
Unit
%
Source
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
71 places, 668 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)