Russia vs Slovenia: Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies

Russia
100.0%
in 2023
Slovenia
100.0%
in 2023
Russia rank
1st
Slovenia rank
1st

Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies over time

  • Russia
  • Slovenia
020406080100201420182023

How they compare

Russia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Russia ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 71 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies, Russia or Slovenia?
Russia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies between Russia and Slovenia?
0.0%, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Slovenia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Russia and Slovenia rank globally for share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies?
Russia ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies
Unit
%
Source
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
71 places, 668 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)