Mozambique vs Tanzania: Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies
Mozambique
17.5%
in 2025
Tanzania
24.5%
in 2024
Mozambique rank
63rd
Tanzania rank
60th
Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies over time
- Mozambique
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 24.5% against 17.5% in Mozambique, a difference of 7.0%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 63rd and Tanzania ranks 60th of 78 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 16.2% | 83.8% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 44.2% | 22.2% | 22.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies, Mozambique or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 24.5% against 17.5% in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies between Mozambique and Tanzania?
- 7.0%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and Tanzania rank globally for share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies?
- Mozambique ranks 63rd and Tanzania ranks 60th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%).