Mexico vs Trinidad and Tobago: Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies
Mexico
100.0%
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2020
Mexico rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies over time
- Mexico
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 71 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 82.5% | 100.0% | 17.5% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies, Mexico or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Mexico, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies between Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.0%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies?
- Mexico ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 71 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)