South Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies
South Korea
100.0%
in 2021
Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2020
South Korea rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies over time
- South Korea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 71 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies, South Korea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- South Korea, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies between South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.0%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do South Korea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 71 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)