Eswatini vs Mozambique: Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies
Eswatini
23.3%
in 2024
Mozambique
17.5%
in 2025
Eswatini rank
61st
Mozambique rank
63rd
Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies over time
- Eswatini
- Mozambique
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 23.3% against 17.5% in Mozambique, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Mozambique ahead.
Eswatini ranks 61st and Mozambique ranks 63rd of 78 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.5% | 100.0% | 81.5% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 22.8% | 44.2% | 21.3% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies, Eswatini or Mozambique?
- Eswatini, at 23.3% against 17.5% in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies between Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 5.8%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Mozambique rank globally for share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies?
- Eswatini ranks 61st and Mozambique ranks 63rd of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments with disaster risk reduction strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%).