Finland vs Kazakhstan: Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies

Finland
100.0%
in 2019
Kazakhstan
100.0%
in 2021
Finland rank
1st
Kazakhstan rank
1st

Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies over time

  • Finland
  • Kazakhstan
020406080100201520182021

How they compare

Finland currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0%.

Finland ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 1st of 71 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies, Finland or Kazakhstan?
Finland, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
What is the difference in share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies between Finland and Kazakhstan?
0.0%, with Finland ahead.
How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies?
Finland ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 1st of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies
Unit
%
Source
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
71 places, 668 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)