Ecuador vs Serbia: Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies
Ecuador
81.6%
in 2023
Serbia
75.9%
in 2023
Ecuador rank
38th
Serbia rank
41st
Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 81.6% against 75.9% in Serbia, a difference of 5.7%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Ecuador ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 41st of 71 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.7% | 1.7% | 41.0% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 81.6% | 75.9% | 5.8% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 81.6% against 75.9% in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 5.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies?
- Ecuador ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 41st of 71 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)