Canada vs Slovenia: Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies
Canada
100.0%
in 2025
Slovenia
100.0%
in 2024
Canada rank
1st
Slovenia rank
1st
Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies over time
- Canada
- Slovenia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 78 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies, Canada or Slovenia?
- Canada, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies between Canada and Slovenia?
- 0.0%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Slovenia rank globally for share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies?
- Canada ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%).