Bangladesh vs Nepal: Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies
Bangladesh
11.9%
in 2020
Nepal
16.9%
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
60th
Nepal rank
57th
Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies over time
- Bangladesh
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 16.9% against 11.9% in Bangladesh, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Nepal ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 57th of 71 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies, Bangladesh or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 16.9% against 11.9% in Bangladesh as of 2019.
- What is the difference in share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies between Bangladesh and Nepal?
- 5.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Nepal rank globally for share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies?
- Bangladesh ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 57th of 71 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of local governments that implemented local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)