Low income vs Viet Nam: Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female
Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female over time
- Low income
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 94.5% against 46.6% in Low income, a difference of 47.9%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 2.0 times Low income's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 38th and Viet Nam ranks 38th of 38 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30.7% | 87.2% | 56.5% | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 36.7% | 90.2% | 53.4% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 38.0% | 91.2% | 53.1% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 46.2% | 94.5% | 48.3% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female, Low income or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 94.5% against 46.6% in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female between Low income and Viet Nam?
- 47.9%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2018.
- How do Low income and Viet Nam rank globally for literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female?
- Low income ranks 38th and Viet Nam ranks 38th of 38 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of the female population between age 25 and age 64 who can, with understanding, read and write a short, simple statement on their everyday life. Generally, ‘literacy’ also encompasses ‘numeracy’, the ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. This indicator is calculated by dividing the number of female literates aged 25-64 years by the corresponding age group population and multiplying the result by 100.