Hong Kong, China vs Togo: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2
Hong Kong, China
1
in 2023
Togo
1
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Togo rank
1st
Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Togo
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1 against 1 in Togo, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2, Hong Kong, China or Togo?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1 against 1 in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2 between Hong Kong, China and Togo?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Togo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Togo rank globally for legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Also include some other legislative aspects that foster good use of statistics eg freedom of information, privacy/transparency, good governance (eg free and fair elections).