Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Panama: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
1
in 2023
Panama
1
in 2023
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
1st
Panama rank
1st

Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 over time

  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
  • Panama
00.20.40.60.81201920212023

How they compare

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 1 against 1 in Panama, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 152 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Panama Difference Ahead
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Panama?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 1 against 1 in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2 between Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Panama?
0, with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Panama?
5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Panama rank globally for legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Panama: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/legislation-indicator-based-on-paris21-indicators-on-sdg-17-18-2/hong-kong-sar-china/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/legislation-indicator-based-on-paris21-indicators-on-sdg-17-18-2/hong-kong-sar-china/panama/">Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Panama: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
152 places, 1,285 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Also include some other legislative aspects that foster good use of statistics eg freedom of information, privacy/transparency, good governance (eg free and fair elections).