Hong Kong vs Kyrgyzstan: Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2
Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 over time
- Hong Kong
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.75 | 0.25 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2, Hong Kong or Kyrgyzstan?
- Hong Kong, at 1 against 1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2 between Hong Kong and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for legislation indicator based on paris21 indicators on sdg 17.18.2?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Legislation Indicator based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Also include some other legislative aspects that foster good use of statistics eg freedom of information, privacy/transparency, good governance (eg free and fair elections).